Common Myths About Public Access

Myth: "No one ever watches PEG Access."

Reality: Access is the primary conduit for niche programming, which the cable television companies once touted as the primary benefit of broadband cable systems. Access is not supposed to be a mass-audience medium. Consequently, the success of PEG access should not be measured by the criteria of commercial television. Access programs can provide "home entertainment," but by and large, that is not usually the purpose of the medium – or the choice of the individuals and organizations, such as schools and churches, that produce PEG programming. In the same way that a seminar at a university is not expected to attract the entire university enrollment, PEG access is not expected to aim for wide viewership, but for interested viewership.

Myth: "Access programming is amateurish."

Reality: Access programs are produced quite inexpensively, when compared to commercial television programs, but still can be designed imaginatively, recorded capably, and edited cleanly. When an access program has been skillfully produced, and the equipment is working correctly, the message – not the production – holds the viewer’s attention. In several communities where adequate financial support has been provided to produce high-quality programming, audience studies have shown high levels of viewership.

Myth: "You don't want your kids Public Access."

Reality: Pornographic, obscene, or libelous programming is illegal on Public Access TV, and the community- and government-directed Public Access Corporation is there to ensure programming standards. Out of a million hours of Public Access programming made, only 9 hours have been deemed legally objectionable. Some of the most enthusiastic proponents of Public Access TV are churches!

Myth: "Nobody needs Public Access."

Reality: We all need access. Many access programs have made a difference in their communities, helping voters to understand (and support) issues as diverse as a local tax ballot measure, the need for a teen center, or to value of community organizations. Strengthen your response to this attack by compiling a list of access programs in your and nearby communities. Notice that this same challenge might be aimed at any book in the public library. People vary in what they need to know, and want to watch (or read), and want to say (or write), so we all need access, just as we all need public libraries.

Myth: "No one would use Public Access."

Reality: Broadcasters have reduced sharply the time for local programs and public service announcements (PSA’s). Compare the number of hours of original programs on access channels (about 20,000 per week) with the number of hours of original, local programming on all broadcast stations combined (somewhat less than 6,000 hours a week, even including all local news and televised sporting events). These figures will surprise you and impress others, particularly those who understand the energy and talent required to produce programming. Communities need – and use – public access channels.

Myth: "The City can't afford Public Access"

Reality: Cities have an endless selection of budgetary needs. Access supports community life, elementary and secondary education, and the efficacy of local social programs. Failing to support these objectives by supporting access will endanger the community’s ability to achieve these other worthwhile goals.